Concerns about the lack of detail
In this scenario, there is a lack of detail, and to get subjects to participate in this research problem Miller (n.d.) said: “People need to know the specifics.” From the scenario described above, there is no indication of who these researchers are nor their credentials. Without a quick biography on the website, it is hard to discern if these researchers are credible to conduct the research. From the scenario, the recruit of subjects for their study seems to be lacking a statement of purpose, which sets the stage, intent, objectives, and major idea of the study to begin with (Creswell, 2014). The statement of purpose gives the reader (the subjects) the reason as to why these researchers want to examine the two styles of leadership. The statement of purpose demonstrates the problem statement, and defines the specific research questions these researchers are studying (Creswell, 2014). Creswell, (2014) stated that effective purpose statements for quantitative research will be written in a deductive language and should include the variables, the relationships between the variables, the participants, and the research location. The intent in quantitative research is demonstrated in the purpose statement through describing the relationships or lack thereof between the variable to be found through either a survey or experiments. Miller (n.d.) and Creswell (2014) stated that identification of theory or conceptual framework is needed to build a strong statement of purpose. Miller (n.d.) goes further to explain that there needs to be a statement of which two leadership styles theories or dimensions will be evaluated in this study.
There is no mention of whether the recruitment of the subjects is part the pilot study, which is used to help develop and try out methods and procedures, or conducting the main study, which is where the collection of actual data for the study is collected (Gall, Gall, & Borg, 2006). The methodology section of this call for subjects should have addressed this. It should also address what type of instrument these researchers are using to collect data from the subjects. There are two main types of data collection: Survey and experiments. It is more likely that this study recruiting subjects to study two types of leadership styles will use surveys as their means of quantitative data collection. Creswell (2014) defines surveys a numerical data collected, studied and analyzed from a sample of the population to find out participant opinions and attitudes. If done correctly, a statistical inference could be applied to aid in applying the results gained from this study to those of the population these researchers are trying to understand on these two leadership styles (Gall et al., 2006). Miller (n.d.) suggested that the surveys could ask about the subjects’ opinions or attitudes towards certain leadership style traits, or the survey could state a few scenarios and have the subjects select a multiple choice answer.
The survey instrument should be either valid and reliable. It should have been either used before in other studies, with slight modifications to fit the parameters of this study, and it should be listed on their website. A slight modification to the instrument may not have held the same validity and reliability as the old instrument. Plus, if there is a lack of validity or reliability in the study’s instrument, then why should the subjects participate and waste their time. Validity and reliability ensure that the results captured through the instrument will provide valid and meaningful results (Creswell, 2014; Miller, n.d.). If the current instrument is not fully valid and reliable, then this could be indications of a pilot study to help refine and build validity and reliability in the instrument (Gall et al., 2006). According to Creswell (2014), there are internal, external, and statistical conclusion threats to validity that must be controlled or mitigated as to help draw out the correct inference of the population.
There is no mention of the population in which these researchers are trying to study on the two leadership styles. If the subject doesn’t fall under the conditions of the population, then the subject doesn’t know if even applying would seem like a waste of time. Creswell (2014) states that depending on the population of the certain study instruments could work better than others, while others are just not well-suited enough to provide the needed validity and reliability needed to generalize results to that population. The researchers could try to narrow their population by stating, “This study aims to understand the relationship between X, Y, and Z, that are displayed in A & B leadership styles among the Latin(x)-Americans population in the state of Oklahoma, from the ages of 25-35 and 45-55.” Thus, subjects that do not fall under this population should not need to worry about applying for the study, saving time for both prospective subjects and the researchers. The study has not mentioned how the population should be narrowed into a few dimensions to fit their study. Thus, one can assume that these researchers may be trying to study the general population, which has a huge number of diverse dimensions that are impossible to study (Miller, n.d.). Unless otherwise stated, any assumption goes based on the facts of this scenario. The scenario does not mention how the researchers plan to obtain a rand selection from this population, and submitting a call through their website, would only draw a special type of population, which may or may not represent the population these researchers are trying to study. The closer the sample represents the study’s aimed population, the more powerful is the statistical inference is to help draw inferences that are more representative of the population (Gall et al., 2006; Miller, n.d.).
Finally, there is a need for subject participation information that would entice participation: how long will the survey take; is there compensation; and will the subject be informed of the results at the end of the survey. If the survey takes too much time and the population that these researchers are trying to sample doesn’t have that time readily available, then the participation rate would decrease. The longer it takes to fill out an assessment, the need for compensation for the subjects is needed. There are two ways to compensate subjects in a study: hand out small amounts of compensation to each participant or at the conclusion of the study; a random drawing is conducted to give out 2-3 prizes of substantial size (Miller, n.d.). Regardless, if there is or is not any form of compensation available, the researchers should consider if there are at least some results or “lessons learned” that would be earned by the subjects through the participation in their study.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). California, SAGE Publications, Inc. VitalBook file.
- Gall, M. D., Gall, J., & Borg W. (2006). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Learning Solutions. VitalBook file.
- Miller, R. (n.d.). Week 5: Research study construction. [Video file]. Retrieved from http://breeze.careeredonline.com/p8v1ruos1j1/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal